This means
that if all the directors are also all the membes, they can unanimously pass a
resolution in a board meeting which ought to strictly require being passed by
members at a general meeting. The
consent given can be express or implied, verbal or by conduct, but it has to be
given and be unqualified.
This
principle is subject to a range of limitations, including that it cannot apply
if the company is insolvent or in danger of being so, or if it is sought in aid
of removing a director or auditor. It
does not override the need for a special resolution for a company to purchase
its own shares. Indeed, in the case law, these limitations are applied strictly
so as to avoid the general extension of such a principle. The members of a company cannot, by
unanimous agreement, overcome prohbitions imposed on the company by the general
law or the Companies Act. For example,
they cannot consent to theft of the company’s property by themselves.
If possible
though, it is better practice for a the directors to table an approriate
written resolution or to immediately convene a general meeting, although
consent to short notice in writing will need to be provided.
In these cases,
if the resolution has to be filed with the Registrar, the Registrar's practice
is to accept a printed copy of the resolution signed by the chairman of the
board.
A good quote
from this case is Buckley J, who states, “where it can be shown that all shareholders
who have a right to attend and vote a general meeting of the company assent to
seom matter which a general meeting of the company could carry into effect,
that assent is as binding as a resolution in general meeting would be.”
No comments:
Post a Comment